Lima, OH – An Allen County sheriff’s deputy was shot in the face during a traffic stop early Tuesday morning.
The incident began at approximately 2:30 a.m. on June 21, when an unidentified Allen County Sheriff’s Office (ACSO) deputy attempted to stop a vehicle on 2nd Street, the sheriff’s office said in a press release.
The driver “immediately fled the scene,” leading the deputy on a brief pursuit that ended several blocks away, according to the ACSO.
The suspect then bailed out of the vehicle and took off on foot.
The deputy chased the suspect down, leading to a physical struggle between them, the ACSO said.
The sheriff’s office said deputy and the suspect exchanged gunfire during the confrontation.
The gunman died from his wounds, and the deputy was shot in the face.
The wounded deputy was rushed to Lima Memorial Health System for emergency care before being transferred to a hospital in the Columbus area, according to the ACSO.
Ohio Attorney General’s Office Press Secretary Steve Irwin said the deputy’s injuries appear to be serious, but that they are not believed to be life threatening, The Lima News reported.
This is long established and WELL KNOWN and WELL TRAINED Protocol!
You engage the shooter and take him out!
You do not wait!
THAT IS PART OF YOUR JOB TODAY IN THIS INSANE WORLD!!!!!
These cops did not. They had a ballistic shield on scene in minutes but they chose to wait and stop heroic unarmed parents from trying to help
COWARDS FVUCKING COWARDS- no monday morning quarterbacking…. THEY ARE FVCKING COWARDS
To any civilian or media or non LEO reading this post- Real Cops and Law Enforcement professionals will not defend the actions of these cowards or their incompetent leadership. The Border Patrol agent (off duty) who raced in and killed the shooter is representative of the vast majority of law enforcement in this nation.
Uvalde Texas Hero Was Off Duty Border Patrol Officer
Engaging the shooter is ESTABLISHED PROTOCOL and every law enforcement agency in America is aware of it.
Unarmed teachers rush into harms way to aid children, we must expect the same from our officers first at the scene. The Uvalde officers stopped engaging the shooter and did not re-enter- even when their numbers increased at the scene. Did their department train them correctly and equip them adequately for this type of incident?
No further study is necessary. No further analysis is needed.
This was the same terrible outcome as other non-engaged shooter incidents. We know what happens when law enforcement fails to engage- we have too many deadly examples.
The Texas incident is virtually identical to the Columbine HS response, where law enforcement formed a perimeter outside waiting for the arrival of SWAT as kids were hunted down and slaughtered.
The difference is that there wasn’t an effective plan in place at the time of Columbine. This department should have been well aware of the established protocol.
The response and actions of these officers demonstrate a failure of the department/city for not having trained officer/s with long guns and higher grade protective gear in the field . A small department has logistical challenges, it would need to be their patrol officers who are tasked with this responsibility.
A critical part of risk assessment/prevention is hardening against the known and common threats- Police trained to respond to a mass shooter is a must today.
Parents beg police to let them enter the school to save the children
Start saving for college through everyday purchases today!
More from Texas;
In active shooter situations, police officers are trained to confront the shooter immediately — not to wait. But in this week’s elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, the gunman spent more than an hour inside the school before a tactical unit killed him, despite officers’ earlier arrival. That has raised questions about the police response — and whether some of the 19 children and two teachers who died might have been saved if officers had taken a different approach. “When there’s an active shooter, the rules change,” Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw told journalists on Friday, as he gave the most complete account yet of the tragedy that unfolded at Robb Elementary.
McCraw identified a crucial flaw in the police strategy: The incident commander on the scene believed the situation had moved from being an active shooter scenario to one where the gunman had barricaded himself inside the school, McCraw said, with “no kids at risk,” because any civilians inside were already dead. That left a mass of officers waiting for tactical gear and keys to unlock a door, while at least two students inside frantically called 911 to plead for help. “From the benefit of hindsight, where I’m sitting now, of course it was not the right decision,” McCraw said. “It was the wrong decision, period. There’s no excuse for that.”
“Those kids need help” immediately, an expert says There are few national standards when it comes to policing, but there is some consistency. In the years since the Columbine school shooting, law enforcement officers have been trained to engage an active shooter as soon as possible.
“The protocol is, as soon as you determine there is an active shooter you don’t wait for anyone,” says Steve Ijames, an expert who has led training sessions on active-shooter situations for police agencies since the mid-1990s.
“You enter and move [to] neutralize and it may be at your peril,” Ijames said. “It’d be great if you had some help — but I can assure you those kids need help more than you need help.”
After the gunman shot at police officers in Uvalde, they called for resources like body armor and marksmen, assuming he was barricading himself inside. But McCraw said on Friday that if police believed people were still alive in the school, they would have been obligated to show greater urgency. There were “19 officers in there,” he said, adding, “there’s plenty of officers to do whatever needed to be done.”
A good example of a small town department response plan;
It is critical that every department trains for and develops a response to this type of incident because the first responding officers MUST engage the typically well armed shooter.
Responding officers must recognize that more than half of mass-shooting incidents—
57 percent—still will be underway,
75 percent requiring law enforcement personnel to confront the perpetrator before the threat ends.
And, one-third of those officers will be shot as they engage.
First responders face the threat of force as part of their daily jobs. Although tactical teams, such as SWAT, train for barricade situations and multiple-member entries, active-shooter training focuses on five-person-or-less building entries. Responding officers may not previously have trained to face this unique type of threat. According to SC Combs, “We’ve been asked to do our part to help law enforcement better prepare for the next Newtown. With so many officers engaged in shootings, it’s important we do whatever we can to help try to change that and make them safer.”
Active-Shooter Statistics
Active-shooter incidents often occur in small- and medium-sized communities where police departments are limited by budget constraints and small workforces.10
The average active-shooter incident lasts 12 minutes. Thirty-seven percent last less than 5 minutes.11
Overwhelmingly, the offender is a single shooter (98 percent), primarily male (97 percent). In 40 percent of the instances, they kill themselves.12
Two percent of the shooters bring IEDs as an additional weapon.13
In 10 percent of the cases, the shooter stops and walks away. In 20 percent of the cases, the shooter goes mobile, moving to another location.14
Forty-three percent of the time, the crime is over before police arrive. In 57 percent of the shootings, an officer arrives while the shooting is still underway.15
The shooter often stops as soon as he hears or sees law enforcement, sometimes turning his anger or aggression on law enforcement.16
Patrol officers are most likely responding alone or with a partner. When responding alone, 75 percent had to take action.17
A third of those officers who enter the incident alone are shot by the intruder.18
UPDATED with amended toll: Nineteen second- to fourth-grade students and at least two adults, one of whom was a teacher, were killed in a mass shooting at an elementary school west of San Antonio today, the Associated Press reported late tonight.
The outlet also reported that federal law enforcement officials expect the death toll to rise. There are unconfirmed reports of multiple injuries.
Gov. Greg Abbott had said earlier that 14 children and one teacher were killed in the shooting at Robb Elementary School in Ulvade. The 18-year-old gunman was shot dead by officers and acted alone, Abbott said.
Feds Not Enforcing Law Equally-Feds Gathered Massive Amounts To Data To Get Evidence Used In Charging 300+ Rioters Meanwhile they release the leftwing agitators who acted as agent provocatuers and led the charge ……….
A PROTESTER who allegedly punched NYPD Chief Terence Monahan on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City on Wednesday morning has been released without bail.
Why do we allow them to protect these leftwing domestic terrorists?
They should not be protesting at the homes of the Justices….but they are allowed
Violent leftwing terrorists are arrested for violent crimes against citizens and police- yet they receive little if any jail time.
Enough!
Washington, DC – The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) warned law enforcement partners this month about threats to burn down or storm the U.S. Supreme Court and to murder the judges and their clerks, members of Congress, and protesters in response to a leaked draft of an opinion that indicated the justices were planning to overturn Roe v. Wade.
The DHS memo sent on May 13 warned the federal agency’s partners that “domestic violence extremists and criminal actors have adopted narratives surrounding abortion rights to encourage violence, likely increasing the threat to government, religious, and reproductive healthcare personnel and facilities and ideological opponents,” Axios reported.
Start saving for college through everyday purchases today!
The memo predicted the threats – which also targeted clergy and health care providers – “are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the Court’s official ruling.”
“Some racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists’ embrace of pro-life narratives may be linked to the perception of wanting to ‘save white children’ and ‘fight white genocide,’” the memo read.
Although abortion issue-related violence has historically come from the pro-life extremist side, DHS warned law enforcement in the memo that this time, the threats were coming from both sides, Axios reported.
“We assess that the broader ideological spectrum of potential DVEs (domestic violent extremists) linked to recent abortion-related threats likely seek to target a range of individuals and entities,” the memo read, according to CNN.
“Historically, violent acts related to this issue were primarily committed by abortion-related violent extremists that opposed abortion rights. Going forward, grievances related to restricting abortion access could fuel violence by pro-choice abortion-related violent extremists and other DVEs,” DHS wrote.
DHS offered an example of a social media administrator who on May 7 encouraged other users to engage in “unrelenting violence” as an alternative to counter-protest, according to CNN.
But law enforcement shouldn’t be too aggressive in trying to do anything about these extremists, according to the memo.
“The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics does not constitute domestic violent extremism or illegal activity and is constitutionally protected,” DHS reminded its law enforcement partners.
DHS told Axios the agency was committed to protecting free speech and other civil rights and civil liberties.
American Police News 