Uncensored Truth about America’s Law Enforcement Heroes
Family: Stimulus check argument led to Indianapolis quadruple murder
INDIANAPOLIS (WXIN) – Her family said Jeanettrius Moore worked hard at a beauty supply shop to support herself and two little girls and appreciated the most recent $1,400 stimulus check issued to help Americans recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.
The father of her youngest baby, Malik Halfacre, thought he should get half.
“He wanted some of Jeanettrius’ tax money, stimulus money,” said Wendy Johnson, a cousin who heard Jeanettrius’ account of what led up to a quadruple murder at an Indianapolis home Saturday night.
Johnson said she was told that the day before the shooting Halfacre told Moore “he wanted half of her money.”
“She said, ‘No, you don’t deserve any of this. I work. I take care of our child. You don’t do anything,’” Johnson recalled.
After he insisted, Johnson said Moore relented, offering $450 – but that wasn’t enough. Johnson said Halfacre vowed to “get that money.”
Johnson was told that on Saturday evening, Moore was outside at the curb looking after her car when Halfacre walked up.
“She said he gave her an evil look and walked off,” said Johnson. “He came back.”
Police said after Halfacre came back for a second time, four people were dead, the mother of his child was wounded, the baby was missing, and the ex-con was on the run.
BLM and ANTIFA burned down city blocks, illegally occupied part of Seattle, trapped cops in their stationhouse and tried to burn it down, threw moltov cocktails into occupied police cars, and stormed and occupied state Capitols, leaving many dead and wounded at year end. This man attended a legal rally as did the second, who also provided security for the speakers. This is a travesty and flake.
Joshua James was arrested this week and is being charged in connection to the violent events of January 6th in Washington D.C.
Joshua James is an Iraq War veteran. He was wounded in a bomb blast in Iraq. And Joshua is being held by the FBI without bail.
Joshua is the breadwinner in his family. He receives retirement pay from the military. He has three young children including a 3-year-old.
The FBI lured him out of his home in Alabama by pretending to be a customer needing a pressure washing.
Then an Army armored vehicle with a turret on top, 2 FBI vans, 6 FBI vehicles, 3 local police and sheriff’s vehicles pulled up and ransacked their home.
Audrey James, his wife, was forced to sit outside for 8 hours with her 3-year-old while the FBI searched their home and broke a light fixture.
Joshua James is a war hero, a veteran, a Godly man, a provider, and a business owner. Joshua James DID NOT commit any violent crime. He attended the January 6th speech by President Trump at the Ellipse along with a million other Americans. He volunteered to work security with other members of the Oath Keepers.
The FBI is holding him until trial because he was seen speaking with two other members of the Oath Keepers that day.
How is this legal?
On Friday The Gateway Pundit spoke with Audrey James and she is understandably distraught.
The FBI is going to move Joshua James to Washington DC.
Unreal……… This kid was armed and just committed an armed robbery. He failed to comply with the orders given. Split second life and death decisions….and you end up dead…… or in jail now if wrong? No thank you.
6 women and counting and no outraged feminists to be seen (they aren’t feminists, they are goons for the democrat party) and thousands killed in nursing homes he ordered covid patients into. He is still the governor. Still think its all on the level?
Let’s not forget what this is all about. They want him out so he doesn’t face charges and investigation for killing 14K NY’ers in Nursing Homes. Democrat politicians are serial sexual predators and are protected by the machine from victims and prosecution- until they become a liability.
Support to redistribute police department funding has decreased among Americans since August after a summer of protests had erupted across the country against racial injustice and police brutality, a recent Ipsos/USA TODAY poll found.
The call to redistribute police budgets stemmed from Black Lives Matter activists and protesters who called to “defund the police” after the deaths of unarmed Black Americans at the hands of police, such as George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.
While some believe defunding the police is a call to get rid of law enforcement completely, many activists behind the slogan intended to make a more nuanced argument for police budgets to be steered toward community social programs so officers were less often required to take on roles better suited to social workers.
Only 18% of respondents supported the movement known as “defund the police,” and 58% said they opposed it. Though white Americans (67%) and Republicans (84%) were much more likely to oppose the movement, only 28% of Black Americans and 34% of Democrats were in favor of it.
“Don’t defund the police department. We need them here to keep law and order,” said Kevin Hayworth, 66, of Garner, Iowa, who is white. “We need our police department just as they are.”
And the responses were even more negative when Americans were asked if they thought the police should be abolished or eliminated, with 67% overall saying they were opposed, including a majority of Black Americans and Democrats.
But respondents were less opposed to the idea of redirecting police funds to social services, though a 57% majority was still against the idea. Forty-three percent of Americans supported the idea. Those numbers represented a slight decline from August, after the peak of the protests, when 53% were opposed and 47% were in favor of redirecting police spending.
Respondent Valda Pugh, 67, a retiree from Louisville, Kentucky, believes that when the call to defund the police began, people didn’t fully understand the concept. “When it first surfaced, I think people had the wrong definition of what that meant. We still obviously need a police force. We need them in full force.”
Steve Laskowitz, 73, of Boca Raton, Florida, agreed.
“I think it’s misguided,” said Laskowitz, who was among those surveyed. “I don’t think anybody wants to defund the police. I think we might want to restructure how the police budget is spent, better training, better analysis of the people who become police and more efforts towards community involvement.”
Support for the effort to redirect police spending was clearly divided along political and racial lines.
Eighty-four percent of Republicans polled support fully funding police budgets, while only33% of Democrats would like to keep police budgets at their current levels. The survey found that 67% of Democrats support redistributing portions of police budgets to social programs, compared with only 16% of Republicans.
“I don’t like that concept, and I thought the minute it came out ‘defund’ was a horrible word. ‘Reallocate’ would be the correct word,” said Mary DeLucco, a Democrat from Portland, Oregon. “Police are already defunded. … We’re already understaffed in Oregon for police issues. We had five shootings yesterday, and cops are having a hard time to get to those locations. They’re just not enough of them.”
Support for the redistribution of money was also divided by the race of voters. Sixty-three percent of Black voters support distributing portions of police funds to social programs, while 35% of white voters do. Most white voters surveyed supported fully funding the police: 65% say police budgets should remain the same compared, with 37% of Black voters.
Pugh, who is Black, also told USA TODAY that money shouldn’t be taken away from police but “can just reallocate some of that to do more training.”
Philip Hamel, 47, of Agawam, Massachusetts, who is white, called defunding the police a “recipe for full-scale trouble.”
“And if they try that we may have a prospect that people may stand up and say: ‘No way, ma’am. We’re taking up arms and forming a militia.’ If it does, I hate to prophesize it, we may have civil (war) No. 2, but this time crazy socialist versus true-blooded Americans,” Hamel said.
The poll was conducted March 1-2 from an online sample of 1,165 Americans. Rather than a margin of error, Ipsos measured its “credibility interval,” which it put at plus or minus 3.3 percentage points.
American Police News 